Police Entrance Practice Exam

What is the primary difference between reactive and proactive policing?

1. Reactive policing is more expensive

2. Reactive policing responds to incidents as they occur

3. Proactive policing is less effective

4. Proactive policing requires more officers

The correct answer is: Reactive policing responds to incidents as they occur

The primary difference between reactive and proactive policing lies in the approach to crime and community safety. Reactive policing involves responding to crimes and incidents after they have occurred. This approach is typically characterized by police waiting for calls for service or incidents to happen before taking action, focusing on responding to situations as they arise. In contrast, proactive policing emphasizes preventing crime before it occurs. This strategy can include community engagement, patrols in high-crime areas, and efforts to deter criminal behavior through various initiatives. By understanding this fundamental distinction, one can appreciate how each method influences overall police strategy and community safety. Reactive policing often addresses immediate issues while proactive policing aims to reduce the likelihood of incidents occurring in the first place.